Zitadel vs Ory

Side-by-side comparison of identity tools. Sponsored placement is disclosed where applicable.

Quick answer

Zitadel vs Ory: which should you choose?

Short answer

Zitadel vs Ory have overlapping use cases in identity and access management. The right pick depends on your company size, deployment model, integrations, and pricing tolerance — compare those attributes side-by-side below.

Best for
Zitadel: B2B SaaS teams that want multi-tenant identity with both self-hosted open source and managed cloud options. · Ory: Engineering teams that want composable, open source identity and authorization primitives, self-hosted or as SaaS.
When to choose
Pick the option whose company-size fit, deployment model, and integrations most closely match your stack.
When not to choose
Skip a head-to-head if you haven't shortlisted a category yet — start with the IAM Stack Finder instead.
Attribute
Best forB2B SaaS teams that want multi-tenant identity with both self-hosted open source and managed cloud options.Engineering teams that want composable, open source identity and authorization primitives, self-hosted or as SaaS.
Short descriptionOpen source identity and access platform with built-in multi-tenancy, SSO, MFA and a managed Zitadel Cloud SaaS.Open source identity, authorization and zero trust stack (Kratos, Hydra, Keto, Oathkeeper) available self-hosted or as Ory Network SaaS.
Company sizestartup, smb, mid_market, enterprisestartup, smb, mid_market, enterprise
Deploymentsaas, self_hostedsaas, self_hosted, hybrid
Sourceopen sourceopen source
Pricing modeltieredusage_based
IntegrationsOIDC, OAuth 2.0, SAML, SCIM, LDAPOIDC, OAuth 2.0, SAML, SCIM, Kubernetes
CategoriesSSO, Workforce IAM, Developer AuthenticationCustomer Identity / CIAM, Developer Authentication
Claimed profile
Buyer help

Request a vendor shortlist

Tell us what you're evaluating and IDSync will identify the identity, access, and security tools that fit your use case.

Request shortlist →