SuperTokens vs Zitadel

Side-by-side comparison of identity tools. Sponsored placement is disclosed where applicable.

Quick answer

SuperTokens vs Zitadel: which should you choose?

Short answer

SuperTokens vs Zitadel have overlapping use cases in identity and access management. The right pick depends on your company size, deployment model, integrations, and pricing tolerance — compare those attributes side-by-side below.

Best for
SuperTokens: Developers who want a self-hostable, open source auth library with prebuilt UI and modern session management. · Zitadel: B2B SaaS teams that want multi-tenant identity with both self-hosted open source and managed cloud options.
When to choose
Pick the option whose company-size fit, deployment model, and integrations most closely match your stack.
When not to choose
Skip a head-to-head if you haven't shortlisted a category yet — start with the IAM Stack Finder instead.
Attribute
Best forDevelopers who want a self-hostable, open source auth library with prebuilt UI and modern session management.B2B SaaS teams that want multi-tenant identity with both self-hosted open source and managed cloud options.
Short descriptionOpen source auth library with prebuilt UI, session management and self-hosted or managed deployment options.Open source identity and access platform with built-in multi-tenancy, SSO, MFA and a managed Zitadel Cloud SaaS.
Company sizestartup, smb, mid_marketstartup, smb, mid_market, enterprise
Deploymentsaas, self_hostedsaas, self_hosted
Sourceopen sourceopen source
Pricing modelfreemiumtiered
IntegrationsOIDC, OAuth 2.0, SAML, SCIMOIDC, OAuth 2.0, SAML, SCIM, LDAP
CategoriesCustomer Identity / CIAM, Developer AuthenticationSSO, Workforce IAM, Developer Authentication
Claimed profile
Buyer help

Request a vendor shortlist

Tell us what you're evaluating and IDSync will identify the identity, access, and security tools that fit your use case.

Request shortlist →