Astrix Security vs Natoma
Side-by-side comparison of identity tools. Sponsored placement is disclosed where applicable.
Quick answer
Astrix Security vs Natoma: which should you choose?
Short answer
Astrix Security vs Natoma have overlapping use cases in identity and access management. The right pick depends on your company size, deployment model, integrations, and pricing tolerance — compare those attributes side-by-side below.
- Best for
- Astrix Security: Enterprise security teams — particularly existing Cisco security customers — who want NHI and AI agent identity controls that will live inside Cisco Identity Intelligence, Duo, and Secure Access. · Natoma: IT, platform, and security teams rolling out AI agents and MCP-based tool access across a workforce and needing centralized governance instead of scattered local configurations.
- When to choose
- Pick the option whose company-size fit, deployment model, and integrations most closely match your stack.
- When not to choose
- Skip a head-to-head if you haven't shortlisted a category yet — start with the IAM Stack Finder instead.
- Related tools & categories
- Astrix SecurityNatomaIAM Stack FinderBuyer resources
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Enterprise security teams — particularly existing Cisco security customers — who want NHI and AI agent identity controls that will live inside Cisco Identity Intelligence, Duo, and Secure Access. | IT, platform, and security teams rolling out AI agents and MCP-based tool access across a workforce and needing centralized governance instead of scattered local configurations. |
| Short description | Astrix Security discovers and secures non-human identities, AI agents, and MCP servers, and provisions secure-by-design agents through its Agent Control Plane with short-lived credentials and just-in-time access. Following its acquisition by Cisco, its capabilities are being integrated into Cisco's identity and zero-trust portfolio. | Natoma provides a governed way to connect AI agents and clients (such as Claude Code, ChatGPT, and Snowflake Cortex) to enterprise tools through a catalog of 100+ verified MCP servers, with identity-aware access policies, agent IAM, and audit trails. It began as a non-human identity management platform and has centered its product on secure agentic connectivity. |
| Company size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Startup, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Deployment | SaaS / Cloud-hosted | SaaS / Cloud-hosted, Self-hosted |
| Source | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing model | Contact vendor for pricing | Freemium with paid Pro and Enterprise tiers |
| Integrations | AWS, GCP, Azure, Kubernetes, Okta, GitHub, Snowflake, Salesforce | Snowflake, Claude, ChatGPT, CrowdStrike, SAML SSO, SCIM, OAuth 2.1 |
| Categories | Non-Human Identity, AI Agent Identity, Machine Identity, SaaS Access Governance | AI Agent Identity, Non-Human Identity |
| Claimed profile |
Buyer help
Request a vendor shortlist
Tell us what you're evaluating and IDSync will identify the identity, access, and security tools that fit your use case.